MMR Vaccine Approved After Only 42-Day-Trials In 1978, Per FDA FOIA Reports

By Catherine J. Frompovich

Del Bigtree of High Wire filed FOIA requests with the U.S. FDA for the MMR vaccine trials results. What he got back is more than a shocker; it borders on criminal malfeasance and breach of fiduciary duty, basically. The trials for the MMR vaccine lasted only 42 days! Furthermore, those studies included a total of only 800 kids in 8 studies who, basically, decided the ‘efficacy’ of the MMR vaccine.

Are those 8 measly studies “science-based medicine”?

Here is a link to the study PDF https://icandecide.org/government/FDA-Production-FOIA.pdf .

This is undeniable proof the MMR vaccine studies in 1978 had proven the MMR vaccine has not been proven safe, nor effective in some children who contracted the measles during the trial. There are 215 pages!

ONLY 42-day MMR Vaccine Studies!
Shocking MMR vaccine trial results released — gastrointestinal & upper-respiratory illness reported
9 minutes

[embedded content]
https://youtu.be/Fil_fsdL4ZA?t=35

Print, save and give the PDF link to your pediatrician, family doctor, county health department and school districts. They now should know the real facts regarding the MMR vaccine’s efficacy and safety. The time for vaccine propaganda is up!

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Source

FDA Wants to Lower Amount of Fluoride in Bottled Water, but Scientists Say it is Still Too High

By Emma Fiala

Rather than combating the high levels of pesticides found in much of the food grown in the United States, the negative effects of factory farming, or the lack of clean water available to numerous communities across the country, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is proposing slightly lowering the standard for fluoride content in bottled water.

Thankfully, scientists and environmental organizations alike are pushing back on the proposed changes, saying the new standard will still be too high for safe consumption.

The FDA’s current standard straddles 0.8 and 1.7 milligrams per liter. The new regulation, if finalized, will lower the standard for both imported and domestically packaged bottled water to 0.7 milligrams per liter. The new regulation only addresses bottled water with fluoride added during the process, not bottled water that contains fluoride from the source.

For years, critics of the fluoridation of drinking water have maintained that it is not safe nor helpful in combating tooth decay. As long as critics of fluoride have existed, so has a campaign to mock those same people as conspiracy theorists or science deniers.

In 2015, the U.S. Public Health Service suggested that 0.7 milligrams per liter was the optimal concentration for fluoride in community water. According to the FDA, the proposed rule “is based on findings from evolving research on optimal concentrations of fluoride that balances fluoride’s benefits in preventing tooth decay with its risk of causing dental fluorosis, a condition most often characterized by white patches on teeth.” Dental fluorosis is caused when too much fluoride is consumed while teeth are still developing.

Some scientists are now speaking out, expressing concerns extending beyond tooth health and instances of dental fluorosis.

Christopher Neurath, research director of the American Environmental Health Studies Project, published a study this year highlighting a “dramatic increase in fluorosis” over the last decade. Over 30% of adolescents involved in the study showed “moderate and severe dental fluorosis” with 35% showing lesser, but still significant, signs of dental fluorosis.

Neurath maintains that the slight decrease in bottled water fluoridation that would result if the standard were approved would do little to reduce occurrences of dental fluorosis.

“Dental fluorosis is a visible sign of overexposure to fluoride, but there are other nonvisible signs and adverse health effects that are much more serious,” Neurath said. “Currently, there are rapidly increasing scientific studies showing neurotoxicity to fluoride.”

Dr. Philippe Grandjean, adjunct professor of environmental health at the Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, wrote:

Given that fluoride can damage brain development, I would recommend that the maximum fluoride concentration in bottled water be kept at a lower level than 0.7 mg/L.

Neurath calls the link between IQ and fluoride exposure in the womb their “largest concern.” Neurath insists the effects of prenatal exposure to fluoride on IQ is “very large,” adding that “on a population basis, that’s very concerning.”

As reported by CNN:

Morteza Bashash, an assistant professor in the Dalla Lana School of Public Health at the University of Toronto, found that higher fluoride levels as measured in urine samples of pregnant women are associated with both lower IQ and increased risk of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder among children in Mexico.

Bashash found “a drop in children’s scores on intelligence tests for every 0.5 milligram-per-liter increase in fluoride exposure beyond 0.8 milligrams per liter detected in a pregnant mother’s urine.”

Despite concerns, the American Dental Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics “fully support the public health benefits of community water fluoridation.”

Dr. Grandjean maintains, “Given that fluoride is added to toothpaste to secure that the enamel surface of the teeth is properly protected against caries, there is no need to supplement the dietary fluoride intake.”

For those in the know about the potential effects of water fluoridation, avoiding bottled water in the United States is one way to avoid its ill effects. While many adults and parents choose to avoid toothpaste and dental treatments that include fluoride, many remain unaware or helpless when it comes to municipal water supply fluoridation, meaning the water consumed directly or used in cooking in homes, schools, and restaurants alike contains invisible and odorless fluoride.

More and more Americans are combating municipal water fluoridation by using filtration systems that remove fluoride like reverse osmosis, gravity filters, distillers, and pitchers. While all four types remove fluoride, each has advantages and disadvantages including cost, ease of use, mineralization and more.

In addition to individuals, since 1990 more than 400 communities across the United States and Canada have opted to end municipal fluoridation. A list of those communities can be found here. When it comes to reversing municipal fluoridation, the process usually begins with one concerned citizen making their neighbors and city council aware. Visit the Fluoride Action Network to learn how to start a successful local fluoride-free campaign.

This article was sourced from The Mind Unleashed.

Source

If Truth Be Told: Pregnancy Vaccines Are Not Tested For Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility Proof In Vaccine Package Inserts

By Catherine J. Frompovich

Carcinogenesis: capable of causing cancer(s)
Mutagenesis: capable of causing birth defects
Impairment of Fertility: the ability to interfere with reproduction


What in the world are the dingbats at HHS/CDC/FDA and Big Pharma thinking and implementing in mandating pregnant females receive vaccines which have not been tested for the very horrors pregnant mothers—or anyone else—would want to consider IF they knew the truth about those vaccines?

Below are vaccines pregnant females must receive only relatively recently; the information is taken from vaccine package inserts online. Each vaccine has a Section 13 Nonclinical Toxicology wherein the vaccine manufacturer bold-faced tells the FACT that testing for the vaccine’s capability to cause cancer, birth defects and to interfere with human reproduction HAVE NOT BEEN DONE and, apparently, will never be done, so as to be able to make unknowns a given without legal liability!

Is that science-based medicine?

Is that a fraudulent practice by medicine and pharmacology?

Vaccines Required During Pregnancy

  1. Flu (influenza)

FLUARIX QUADRIVALENT.
GKS 13 NONCLINICAL TOXICOLOGY 13.1

Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility FLUARIX QUADRIVALENT has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or male infertility in animals. Vaccination of female rats with FLUARIX QUADRIVALENT had no effect on fertility [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1)]. — GlaxoSmithKline [Pg. 16]

  1. Tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoidand acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine

GKS Boostrix tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine, adsorbed

13 NONCLINICAL TOXICOLOGY
13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility

BOOSTRIX has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility. GlaxoSmithKline [Pg. 16]

Examples of vaccines to avoid during pregnancy include:

Chickenpox (varicella) vaccine
Measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine
Shingles (varicella-zoster) vaccine

Source: MayoClinic.org

Merck’s MMR II

Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility M-M-R II has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or potential to impair fertility.

Pregnancy Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with M-M-R II. It is also not known whether M-M-R II can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity. Therefore, the vaccine should not be administered to pregnant females; furthermore, pregnancy should be avoided for 3 months following vaccination (see IN (see INDICATIONS AND USAGE, Non-Pregnant Adolescent and Adult Females and CONTRAINDICATIONS). — Merck [Pg.6]

Institute for Vaccine Safety
http://www.vaccinesafety.edu/package_inserts.htm
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
61 vaccine package insert publications
Lists: Vaccine, Antigen(s), Manufacturers, Latest Version [pkg. insert]

Based upon the above information, why aren’t allopathic medical doctors demanding proof of vaccine safety from CDC/FDA and Big Pharma regarding any vaccines ability to cause cancer(s), birth defects and interfere with fertility?

Where is congressional oversight, or is Congress afraid if they investigated, they’d lose their election campaign funding?

If Big Pharma’s largess didn’t fund much of CDC/FDA [The Biopharmaceutical Industry Provides 75% Of The FDA’s Drug Review Budget. Is This A Problem?], and Congress did not receive Big Pharma lobbyists’ election-cycle donations, would U.S. citizens have a better healthcare—or is it sickness care—system

According to Open Secrets, during the 2016 election cycle, the industry gave over$16 million to 399 members of the House of Representatives, an average of more than $40,000 per member. They also gave more than $7 million to a total of 97 senators, at an average of roughly $75,000.

Source: CitizensForEthics.org

If only truth be told!

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Source

If Truth Be Told About The SV-40 Cancer Virus In The Original Polio Vaccines Given To Millions Of American Children

By Catherine J. Frompovich

The current “police state” actions being implemented regarding vaccination dissenters is due to the public’s mistrust of the CDC/FDA/Big Pharma consensus science regarding vaccines unknown viruses and neurotoxic ingredients causing adverse effects in children’s health, which has an historical, plus congressional hearing validation, anyone who values good health and well children must consider seriously.

Merck’s premiere vaccine inventor, Dr. Maurice Hilleman, was astute enough to realize something was amiss with the production of vaccines, which he documents in the video below.

The Polio Vaccine Has Cancer Virus, SV40, According to Dr. Maurice Hilleman
10:37 minutes


https://youtu.be/1-XZs53vZzw?t=6

Widget not in any sidebars

When he spoke about bringing the monkeys over from Africa, which they used to manufacture the polio vaccine, he had this to say, “I brought African greens in. I didn’t know we were importing AIDS virus at the time.”[1]

Dr. Hilleman stated, “Yellow fever vaccine had leukemia virus in it. This was in the day of very crude science. [1]

If you think the above was something “of a fluke” or a “figment of conspiracy theorists imaginations,” then you absolutely ought to read the U.S. Government Printing Office online published report of the September 10, 2003 Hearing of the Subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness of the Committee on Government Reform of the House of Representatives of the 108th Congress wherein Congressman Dan Burton is on public record saying:

There is no dispute that millions of Americans received polio vaccines that were contaminated with the virus called Simian Virus 40, or SV-40. There also is no dispute that SV-40 is capable of causing cancer, but there is a major dispute as to how many Americans may have received the contaminated vaccine, with estimates ranging from 4 million to 100 million people. There is also a major dispute as to when the polio vaccine supply got cleaned up. In addition, nobody knows how many people got sick or died because of the contaminated vaccines.

However, Dr. James Goedert, Chief of Viral Epidemiology, National Cancer Institute, provided an answer as to when the polio vaccine got cleaned up:

In addition, using PCR technology, the FDA itself found no SV-40 DNA molecules in lots that were released between 1972 and 1996.

When did you or your children receive the polio vaccine?

Can the SV-40 cancer virus be lurking within your body?

Why do I say that?

Because the Journal of Infectious Diseases published the article “Simian Virus 40 and Human Disease” wherein this was discussed:

The reported presence of SV40 in tumors in individuals born after 1963 would seem to imply that SV40 is now established as a human infection circulating in communities via person-to-person contact [8]. Other investigators have been skeptical of these claims [9–12]; several groups have not been able to detect SV40 sequences in the aforementioned tumors [13–20], and epidemiologic studies have not revealed an increased risk of these cancers in populations exposed to SV40-contaminated poliovaccines or adenovirus vaccines.

[8] Vilchez RA, Butel JS, Emergent human pathogen simian virus 40 and its role in cancer, Clin Microbiol Rev, 2004, vol. 17 (pg. 495-508)

[CJF emphasis]

In view of the cancer epidemic of recent years, one has to wonder what role, if any, the SV-40 cancer virus in the early polio vaccine had, or is implicated in current cancer demographics, especially in older individuals who received the polio vaccine as a child.

I’d like to point out that FDA used the Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis, a test FDA will not permit to be used to test for determining adverse mitochondrial proclivities (reactions) from mandatory vaccines prior to receiving vaccines/vaccinations, especially in infants whose immune systems are not developed fully until around two years of age!

In those individuals with mitochondrial proclivities, vaccination can be equivalent to immune system castration!

The FDA PCR directive, alone, ought to be considered as criminal activity, since such FDA actions deliberately – by the omission of PCR testing as a routine prophylactic procedure – contributes directly to any vaccine adverse reactions infants, toddlers, teens and adults would experience. Therefore, FDA ought to be held accountable, plus prosecuted, for malfeasance in the management of infectious disease protocols, in my opinion!

References:

[1] unhoodwinked Published on Jan. 9, 2015

Source

If Truth Be Known About The Mumps Vaccine! Animal Blood Antibodies For 10 Years Got FDA Licensure: FRAUD

By Catherine J. Frompovich

In Southeastern Pennsylvania, where I live, a recent ‘pandemic (?)’ of sorts seems to have broken out regarding the infectious disease known as MUMPS. Twenty-some cases!, and everyone is just about going bonkers, specifically one of the universities where the outbreak has been more prominent.

Parents, according to radio news reports, are very upset about the Mumps outbreak. What would those parents have done when Mumps was prevalent when I was a kid in the 1940s? Surprisingly, everyone got well; no deaths, either; Mumps was a child’s “rite of passage,” which “tuned” up the child’s immune system. And, more frightening than anything for current fear-mongered parents to ponder, there was no MMR vaccine doctors could recommend then, since that vaccine did not come on the market until 1971, as Wikipedia points out:

The MMR vaccine was developed by Maurice Hilleman. It was licensed for use by Merck in 1971. Stand alone measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines had been previously licensed in 1963, 1967, and 1969 respectively.

However, what most parents, the university involved, and the Philadelphia media talking heads obviously don’t know, nor want to factor into the equation of vaccine safety and efficacy – especially regarding Merck’s MMR vaccine – is that for close to ten (10) years Merck falsified the Mumps active in the MMR vaccine as having a 95 per cent efficacy rate, which was a bold face fraudulent, scientific lie reported to CDC and FDA, and in turn to the entire globe, since CDC/FDA ‘vaccine theology’ is regarded as an apparent ‘gold standard’?

Those college students who presently have contracted Mumps apparently received the MMR vaccine of the 1990s false efficacy rating for the Mumps active. What impact did that have upon those children’s immune systems?

How incredible those parents deliberately were deceived into believing their children were vaccinated against the Mumps!

But that’s not the only deception(s) regarding vaccines and their politics in medicine and population control methods, which the CDC and FDA are responsible for promoting! Many whistleblowers have come forward over the years about deceit, deception, fraud, consensus science collusion [RICO crimes?] (see the movie VAXXED) and a qui tam whistleblower lawsuit filed in Philadelphia Federal Court, which is discussed below, so gung-ho vaccine acolytes, uneducated MDs and parents can understand how they really are being duped when it comes to vaccines and immunity, especially “community immunity,” aka “herd immunity.”

Huff Post: Merck Has Some Explaining To Do Over Its MMR Vaccine Claims

According to Huff Post,

The first court case, United States v. Merck & Co., stems from claims by two former Merck scientists that Merck “fraudulently misled the government and omitted, concealed, and adulterated material information regarding the efficacy of its mumps vaccine in violation of the FCA [False Claims Act].

[….]

According to the whistleblowers’ court documents, Merck’s misconduct was far-ranging: It “failed to disclose that its mumps vaccine was not as effective as Merck represented, (ii) used improper testing techniques, (iii) manipulated testing methodology, (iv) abandoned undesirable test results, (v) falsified test data, (vi) failed to adequately investigate and report the diminished efficacy of its mumps vaccine, (vii) falsely verified that each manufacturing lot of mumps vaccine would be as effective as identified in the labeling, (viii) falsely certified the accuracy of applications filed with the FDA, (ix) falsely certified compliance with the terms of the CDC purchase contract, (x) engaged in the fraud and concealment describe herein for the purpose of illegally monopolizing the U.S. market for mumps vaccine, (xi) mislabeled, misbranded, and falsely certified its mumps vaccine, and (xii) engaged in the other acts described herein to conceal the diminished efficacy of the vaccine the government was purchasing.

These fraudulent activities, say the whistleblowers, were designed to produce test results that would meet the FDA’s requirement that the mumps vaccine was 95 per cent effective. To the whistleblowers’ delight, the judge dismissed Merck’s objections to the case proceeding, finding the whistleblowers had plausible grounds on all of the claims lodged against Merck.

So, how did Merck allegedly produce 95 per cent effectiveness in the mumps portion of the MMR vaccine results – for almost ten years during the 1990s?

According to two Merck employee mumps vaccine whistleblowers qui tam lawsuit filed in Philadelphia, PA Federal Court, UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Stephen A. KRAHLING and Joan A. Wlochowski, Relators,v. MERCK & CO., INC., Defendant, :

Merck added animal [rabbit] blood antibodies to raise the mumps active in the MMR vaccine to the FDA’s required 95 per cent effective rate, in order to keep Merck’s apparent ‘monopoly’ on the MMR vaccine sales globally.

The Wall Street Journal article asked, “Did Merck Unfairly Monopolize the Market for a Mumps Vaccine?”

Here’s what CaseText.com has to say about that case, which the Judge would not dismiss:

Relators claim that the use of animal antibodies created a high number of pre-vaccinated results, which Defendant systematically destroyed or falsified in order to legitimize the use of animal antibodies.

Ref: Background “B”

Invex News.com: The “FREE” Press Is NOT Free To Tell The Facts About Vaccines

Activist Post: It’s Finally Time For Everyone To Get Real About Measles

The problems with vaccines only grow more complicated the longer the U.S. Congress does not provide an investigation into the fraud in vaccines, which Rep. Bill Posey had requested in 2015; it’s now 2019?

If you’ve never heard Rep. Posey’s opening remarks in the video below, you need to, as they provide a factual reality check with regard to the irresponsible fraudulent vaccine science that has overtaken federal government agencies; counterfeited medical science; and still no one in Congress is concerned about doing anything to correct the destructive “tail wagging the dog.”

Rep Begs Congress: Investigate Vaccine Autism Coverup – C-SPAN 29-07-2015

5:07 minutes

[embedded content]

Resource:

Feature Film by producers of VAXXED
Injecting Aluminum Trailer 2:35 minutes (2017)
http://cinemalibrestudio.com/injecting-aluminum/watch.html?ct=t()

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Source

FDA Approves Controversial GMO Salmon For Import

The United States Food and Drug Administration has decided that their previous ban on genetically modified salmon can be lifted.  In 2016, Congress said the salmon could not be sold in the United States until the FDA finalized labeling guidelines to inform consumers the product was genetically engineered. That’s when the FDA implemented the import alert.

But all that has changed now. In 2015, the FDA deemed the AquaAdvantage Salmon safe, marking the first U.S. approval of a genetically engineered animal intended for food.  But the 2016 import alert prevented the salmon from being sold in the U.S…until now.

According to CNN,  Congress passed a law directing the U.S. Department of Agriculture to set a national mandatory standard for disclosing bioengineered foods. That standard was issued last December.

FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb said because of the 2016 law and the USDA’s new standard, the FDA “no longer has the authority to issue labeling guidance,” CNN reported. “However, the FDA believes this Congressional mandate has been satisfied by the USDA’s issuance of final regulations implementing that law in late 2018 because the law and regulations require that human food containing GE [genetically engineered] salmon bear labeling indicating that it is bioengineered,” Gottlieb said in a statement.

This will allow for the importation of genetically modified salmon eggs into the U.S. to be raised for human consumption.

For some, GMO, when used for food, is a blessing.  The ability to feed many more people than possible with strictly organically raised animals. Many feel that in order to sustain the constantly burgeoning population, GMO foods are a necessity. But for others, the health risks and long term unknown consequences are a curse.

Many claim GMO foods are safe; however, most of the research used to claim that GMOs are safe has been performed by biotechnology companies – those who stand to profit from proclaiming GMOs as “safe.” Still, “several animal studies indicate serious health risks associated with genetically modified (GM) food (AAEM 2009),” including infertility, immune problems, accelerated aging, faulty insulin regulation, and changes in major organs and the gastrointestinal system.

Will you be trying some GMO salmon?

Click here to subscribe: Join over one million monthly readers and receive breaking news, strategies, ideas and commentary. You can read more from Mac Slavo at his site SHTFplan.com

Source