Who Or What Produced The Anti-Vaccine Movement?

By Catherine J. Frompovich

Without a doubt, and unequivocally, the answer has to be Big Pharma with the unwavering help of the U.S. CDC and FDA, plus an assist from the U.S. military, which apparently subsidizes research for “weaponized” vaccines[1] – [2] – [3].

Why?

Perhaps this Forbes article, The Biopharmaceutical Industry Provides 75% Of The FDA’s Drug Review Budget. Is This A Problem?, may explain.

And, as would be expected, “user fees” have gone up over the years, from $208,000 per NDA in 1995 to a whopping $2,421,495 for fiscal year 2018.

How?

Big Pharma ‘researches’, manufactures, markets, including fraud with deceptive practices, in pushing “herd immunity” with patented neurotoxic and highly toxic excipients, which usually do not receive the same testing protocols OR time-sensitive trial studies as regular prescription pharmaceuticals, since vaccines are considered biologicals subject to a 75-cent TAX. What does the U.S. Treasury do with that tax? Read this.

How does FDA-hands-on-testing-malfeasance [Breach of Fiduciary Duty Law[4]?] exempt vaccines from proper safety studies, when almost every vaccine package insert boldly publishes the vaccine has not been tested to cause cancer, birth defects or interfere with human reproductive fertility. Is that safe? Actually, some of the vaccine’s ingredients can and do cause adverse health issues[5]. Please check Section 13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility on any vaccine package insert.

FDA states that

FDA tests and approves vaccines prior to release and shipment.

How can that be, when CDC/FDA further publish this:

Prelicensure: Vaccine Safety Testing | The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) must license (approve) a vaccine before it can be used in the United States. FDA regulations for the development of vaccines ensure their safety, purity, potency, and effectiveness. Before a vaccine is approved by FDA for use by the public, results of studies on safety and effectiveness of the vaccine are evaluated by highly trained FDA scientists and doctors. FDA also inspects the vaccine manufacturing sites to make sure they comply with current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) regulations. Vaccine Development Vaccine development begins in the laboratory. [CJF emphasis]

Source: FDA

How can “Before a vaccine is approved by FDA for use by the public, results of studies on safety and effectiveness of the vaccine are evaluated by highly trained FDA scientists and doctors” be considered FDA tests and approves vaccines prior to release and shipment”? or is that another apparent deceptive practice from CDC/FDA?

If CDC/FDA really performed physical, actual hands-on tests, and not rely upon Big Pharma’s safety testing results—would Pharma tell anything adverse about their vaccines? Does the bear poop in the woods? Then there ought to be archived digital CDC/FDA-performed lab tests results that so called anti-vaxxers – or are they ex-vaxxers whose children experienced harms after vaccinations, can obtain by filing FOIA requests.

How about forming an Ex-Vaxxers FOIA Requests campaign?

Furthermore, shouldn’t there be congressional investigations into whether actual physical FDA testing occurs? Hasn’t Florida Congressman Bill Posey, since August of 2015, been requesting Congress to investigate vaccines based upon CDC whistleblower William Thompson’s factual story of how he participated in autism research fraud?

5:07 minutes



https://youtu.be/8UWPjUSo3_k?t=3

How much longer will healthcare consumers have to live with CDC/FDA obfuscations regarding actual vaccine safety and efficacy?

Why the anti-vaccine movement?

Because previously uninformed consumers, who avidly believed in vaccination ‘efficacy’, i.e., pro-vaxxers, dutifully had CDC/FDA mandated vaccines administered to their children who then suffered adverse health reactions ranging from mild to severe to death, including autism—now one in 59 kids in the USA, suddenly became ex-vaxxers NOT anti-vaxxers, as the common pejorative goes.

The REASON for the anti-vaccine movement

An unparalleled lack of empathy at federal, state and local health administration agencies about vaccine-caused-injury forced ex-vaxxers to tell their vaccine horror stories via the Internet and social media networks in order to educate and, hopefully, prevent other families from experiencing utter devastation when a child suddenly is no longer communicative, but has become sickly and burdensome financially to families.

In August 2012, I wrote the article

Guidelines to Autopsy Medical Tests: Parents Immediately Should Require an Autopsy That Includes Certain Tests because many parents and child caregivers were being charged with “Shaken Baby Syndrome” brought on by hospital medical staff alerting police to what they thought was excessive child abuse. However, the parent(s) knew the facts: No child abuse, but their child received a recent series of vaccines, which apparently precipitated severe encephalopathy[6] mimicking trauma. However, authorities filing SBS charges seems to have disappeared. I wonder why.

Why are questioning, refusing, plus any discussion about vaccine safety and efficacy, forbidden under penalty of law, or provoke police-state-like actions?

Every topic, no matter how bizarre, is not forbidden nor banned from public discourse or memes, but enthusiastically encouraged.

Transhumanism; gender-identify preferences; sexuality; pedophilia; leftist and socialist party geopolitical propaganda; civil rights; women’s rights; satanism, police brutality—you name it—are not subject to the jackboot treatment inadvertently stemming from obsolete 1905 vaccine case law, i.e., Jacobson v. Massachusetts[7] in the United States, which is “cherry picked” for certain enforcement provisions while not enforcing a $5 monetary fine and allowing the refuser to go free and not be vaccinated.

All the above groups, plus others, enjoy unfettered favorable time in multimedia venues, but ex-vaxxers and vaccine safety advocates are deprived their First Amendment rights. Blatant discrimination?

Australia has a gestapo-like vaccine policy; is the U.K. on its way there? Is the USA there now?

What is it about the politics of vaccinology that has the media’s, vaccine acolytes’, medical professions’ and Big Pharma’s britches so twisted? Could it be there may be too many vested-interest individuals who could be held legally at fault if only the truth were known about the real science often known only to the vaccine’s manufacturer?

Is Bayer-Monsanto’s Roundup® legal debacle of close to a thousand pending lawsuits something to replicate?

Resource:
CDC CASE STUDY: Death From Measles Vaccine Virus 15 Months After Vaccination
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/cdc-case-study-death-from-measles-vaccine-virus-15-months-after-vaccination

Notes:

[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1447151/
[2] https://www.congress.gov/congressional-report/106th-congress/house-report/556/1
[3] https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-regulatory-science/us-department-defense-and-fda-collaborate-help-speed-potential-countermeasures-ebola-and-other
[4] https://definitions.uslegal.com/b/breach-of-fiduciary-duty/
[5] https://vaers.hhs.gov/
[6] https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/324008.php
[7] https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/197/11/

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Catherine’s NEW book: Eat To Beat Disease, Foods Medicinal Qualities ©2016 Catherine J Frompovich is now available

Source

“IF Truth Be Told About Vaccines” Anthology HHS-CDC-FDA Propagandize Big Pharma’s Pseudoscience Into Medical ‘Truths’

By Catherine J. Frompovich

Problem>>Reaction>>Solution

Problem

Medical science, based solidly in man-made-patented chemicals, is nothing short of a physiologically inept standard due to its “consensus science” being steeped in the dominant “disease management versus cure” modality using man-made chemicals—petrochemicals, in most cases, plus recently-added nanotechnology, something totally anathema to thousands of years of human (Homo Sapiens) biological evolution!

A rather significant clue to the allopathic paradigm’s healing failure [how long has there been a War on Cancer?] is its inability to factor into its consensus science, thinking and practices, there ARE cumulative effect(s) from all chemicals, including medicines and environmental, in the etiology of disease!

Source: The Truth About Vaccines

“You cannot poison a body into wellness.”

However, that’s not the apparent official position the FDA takes on the current pharmaceutical scourge and scandal coming out of China regarding contaminated blood pressure and heart medications.

The risk associated with abruptly discontinuing the use of these important medicines far outweighs the low risk that our scientists estimate to be associated with continuing the medicine until the patient’s doctor or pharmacist provides a safe replacement or a different treatment option,” the FDA stated.

If allopathic medicine were to acknowledge chemicals as a key precipitating factor – or trigger – in disease morphology, their entire house of cards would come tumbling down since its religious-belief-like educational system and protocols of Rx prescription drugs, chemotherapy, vaccines, biologicals—all man-made and patented were, and are based upon, a ‘monopolistic business plan’ designed by the late John D. Rockefeller (1839 – 1937)[1], whose main objective was to create a global pharmaceutical system of health controls for many reasons. Rockefeller’s prime objective was to eliminate natural medicine being practiced in the USA.

But there was one problem with Rockefeller’s plan for the medical industry: natural/herbal medicines were very popular in America at that time. Almost half the doctors and medical colleges in the U.S. were practicing holistic medicine, using knowledge from Europe and Native Americans.

Rockefeller, the monopolist, had to figure out a way to get rid of his biggest competition. So he used the classic strategy of “problem-reaction-solution.” That is, create a problem and scare people, and then offer a (pre-planned) solution.

This led to the Flexner Report, which gave birth to the modern medicine as we know it.[2]

Rockefeller probably factored into his monopolistic-plan, and thinking, the 1905 Supreme Court Case Jacobson v. Massachusetts[3] which set the standards for vaccination in the USA, and are totally obsolete today since back then in 1905 those who opposed vaccinations were fined only $5, BUT the ingredients (excipients) in vaccines then were ‘relatively harmless’ compared with the neurotoxins and nanoparticles present in today’s mandated vaccines! Thus, the courts must revisit Jacobson and bring it up to date: 1905 elementary immune system science versus 2019 consensus pseudoscience versus factual independent research science denied by vested-interest Big Pharma and CDC/FDA.

As they say, the rest is history. Furthermore, big medicine became the fair-hair child of Big Pharma, a corporate-controlled industry now directing medical schools, the U.S. HHS, CDC, FDA and CONGRESS, a man-made tragedy and criminal activity, in many educated opinions. The result: there’s been a voluminous and precipitous rise in iatrogenic diseases.

Iatrogenic (of a disease or symptoms) induced in a patient by the treatment or comments of a physician. Chambers English Dictionary[4]

Nothing demonstrates the above more clearly than the apparent ideological failure of vaccinology science, which has been delusional from the very beginning starting with Edward Jenner’s hypothesis. See If Truth Be Told About Cowpox & Smallpox Diseases Scientific Differences That Caused A Pharmaceutical Fairytale (March 25, 2019)

That delusion eventually morphed into a legal obstacle for humankind in many ways, i.e., depriving individuals of their right to self-determination in the care of their and their children’s health and bodies, which includes vaccination mandates, forced vaccinations, fines, and Child Protective Services abuses in removing children from parents’ custody and homes.

The fallacy of using aluminum in vaccines started around 1932.

Aluminum was first used in human vaccines in 1932 and was the only adjuvant in use in licensed vaccines for approximately 70 years. Apr 16, 2015[5]

Currently, there are newer adjuvants such as: AS04, MF59 squalene, AS01b, CpG 1018 a synthetic form of DNA.[6]

There’s a huge question about immunology
However, a huge question comes to mind when one considers immunology, a ‘science’ in its infancy days back then in the early 1930s.

When the humoral adaptive response to the aluminum adjuvant was discovered in the early 1900s, one has to wonder if that response was not a very real adverse reaction, since the humoral immune system was activated, not the innate immune system!

Had the rewiring the human immune system begun—inadvertently or intentionally, which enabled vaccine consensus science to plow forward creating the need for booster shots for all diseases. The information below may help you to understand why I make that claim.

The adaptive immune response is largely driven by lymphocytes: T-cells and B-cells. The relative activities of the B-cell and T-cell populations determine the type of immune response generated in response to infection.[7]

Real immunity [innate immunity] is life-long and occurs only after having contracted an infectious disease, which facilitates not having to live a life becoming either a carrier or a ‘progenitor’ of communicable infectious and other vaccine-laden diseases due to vaccine shedding for as long as 30 days post vaccination[8] and post vaccination booster shots!

How can “science-based medicine” be trusted when, in reality, low-level and insufficient populations ‘efficacy and safety’ studies were designed and implemented for a total of 800 children in only 8 remarkable studies to gain approval licensure for the MMR vaccine in 1978?

Furthermore, those studies do not include the ten-year [1990s] fraudulent fudging of efficacy reports for the Mumps active in the MMR vaccine when Merck added rabbit blood antibodies to achieve and meet the 95% efficacy rate required for FDA licensure. See the qui tam whistleblower lawsuit[9] in U.S. Federal Court in Philadelphia.

Thus, there is a specific need for this Anthology to drill down on the fraudulent erroneous propaganda HHS, CDC, FDA and Big Pharma have been promoting GLOBALLY for decades, influencing the World Health Organization (WHO) at the United Nations, foreign governments and local health agencies.

The Selling of Science” or the privatization of knowledge[10]
“The American public would be surprised, and maybe even concerned, if they knew how widespread the practice of self-regulation was.”
… José Solís, PhD

In a quote, which has become part of medical school orientations everywhere, David Sackett, often referred to as the “father of evidence-based medicine,” once famously said:

“Half of what you’ll learn in medical school will be shown to be either dead wrong or out of date within five years of your graduation; the trouble is that nobody can tell you which half–so the most important thing to learn is how to learn on your own.” [11]

—–

For a long time, we were interested by what we believe to be a pervasive problem in modern medicine. Namely, the spread of new technologies and therapies without clear evidence that they work, which are later (and often after considerable delay) followed by contradictions, which, in turn, after yet another delay, is followed by changes in practice and reimbursement.[12]
[CJF emphasis]
Sources: Killing For Profit – at the European Parliament

Resource:
The Fox Owns the Henhouse—When Public Safety is Governed by Private Profit [April 8, 2019]
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/the-fox-owns-the-henhouse-when-public-safety-is-governed-by-private-profit/

Reaction

The “reaction” within a normal Hegelian Dialectic ‘paradigm’[13] is not what’s been occurring in the case of vaccine fraud. Since the Autism explosion[14], there’s been an enlightenment, plus outrage, taking place due to the sharing of knowledge and personal child-and-family life-altering adverse health reaction stories by the thousands, including resolute consumer activism regarding First Amendment and humans’ unalienable rights, which health officials may not have expected.

Here’s one example:

Reality Check: Questioning Vaccines is a Public Health Threat? Ben Swann (March 14, 2019)
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/03/reality-check-questioning-vaccines-is-a-public-health-threat.html

Others:

Attkisson Report Reveals Threats Against Congressmen Investigating Autism-Vaccine Link
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2019/01/attkisson-report-reveals-threats-against-congressmen-investigating-autism-vaccine-link/ (Jan. 9, 2019)

“We spoke to 11 current and former members of Congress and staff who claim they faced pressure, bullying or threats when they raised vaccine safety questions.” Physician and former Rep. Dave Weldon commented, “It would typically be in a hallway or the street and people would come up to you and say, “You know, you really need to, you know, back off on this. It could be, it could be bad for the community or bad for the country or bad for you.”

Congressman Mark Green Under Fire for Seeking Vaccine Truth [Jan. 1, 2019]
https://thetruthaboutcancer.com/mark-green-vaccine-truth/

There are 3 major issues here:

  1. That vaccines have not been proven safe
  2. That the research standards and liability for vaccine manufacturers are uniquely inadequate
  3. That we are currently in the midst of one of the greatest assaults on freedom and integrity in a generation.

Rep. Bill Posey Calling for an investigation of the CDC’s MMR research fraud [July 29, 2015]

[embedded content]

https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4546421/rep-bill-posey-calling-investigation-cdcs-mmr-reasearch-fraud

The Making of a Monster: We’re All Lab Rats in the Government’s Secret Experiments [March 26, 2019]
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/03/the-making-of-a-monster-were-all-lab-rats-in-the-governments-secret-experiments.html

UPS partnering with drug giants to inject you with vaccines in your own home… pilot project a blueprint for nationwide vaccine mandates at gunpoint [April 5, 2019]
https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-04-05-ups-drug-giants-inject-vaccines-home-blueprint-mandates.html

Solution

The only solution to this unprecedented medical police state now encompassing the vaccine fraud perpetrated upon U.S. citizens, plus others globally, is for there to be criminal investigations into the documented FRAUDULENT science manipulation that has taken place time after time at the very agencies entrusted with the safe-keeping of consumer health in the USA.

High-ranking federal HHS/CDC/FDA bureaucrats, researchers, epidemiologists, etc. who have perpetuated these ongoing fraudulent practices must be prosecuted legally at law and removed from their cozy perches of authority reflecting Big Pharma’s controls.

It’s what’s referred to as “breach of fiduciary duty”.

“A person acting in a fiduciary capacity is held to a high standard of honesty and full disclosure in regard to the client and must not obtain a personal benefit at the expense of the client.”

Source: USLegal.com

When Congress enacted the 1986 National Vaccine Law[15], was that a benign or deliberate betrayal of U.S. health consumers, equivalent to ‘throwing them under the bus’, which can be considered criminal and collusive activity, plus a breach of fiduciary duty?

Did Congress essentially absolve vaccine manufacturers from any and all product legal liability claims, thus ensuring Congressional constituents that Congress, figuratively, had “thrown voters under the bus”?

That idiomatic phrase, “thrown under the bus,” represents a veiled spirit of sordid betrayal, plus intended, undeniable deliberate harms, since Congress knew about the tremendous number of lawsuits for vaccine product adverse reactions that prompted Big Pharma to seek Congressional “get out of jail free” cards, or not make vaccines. Was that an illegal act by Big Pharma? Collusion? Sherman Antitrust Act and RICO?

According to the 1986 NCVIA, it preempts all design-defect claims against vaccines as unavoidably unsafe, and was affirmed per the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2011 Brusewitz decision.

In essence, the U.S. Congress sacrificed infants, toddlers, teens, adults and seniors unalienable health rights and personal sovereignty to the ‘arm bending’ and ‘no vaccines manufactured threats’ made by vaccine makers, who, at that time, were subject to “a storm of lawsuits,” more than Big Pharma could defend and probably would have put them out of business! Fast forward to what’s happening with Bayer after purchasing Monsanto and the thousands of glyphosate lawsuits.

That lawsuits admission, alone, should have been THE huge red flag something was wrong with vaccines and for Congress to say, “Hell, no! Clean up your act!”

Thus we can see how Congress knowingly colluded with Big Pharma to ensure denial of product liability legal rights to citizens damaged by vaccine. That NCVIA law gave Big Pharma and the CDC/FDA what amounts to “carte blanche” [complete freedom to act as one wishes or thinks best][16] for the roughshod and draconian vaccination mandates since 1989, ever increasing to today’s nightmares!

Needless to say, “all hell’s broken lose” and there’s more fraudulent disinformation about vaccine ‘science’ than probably at any time in history, since the CDC/FDA literally have become the Big Pharma vaccine machine ‘mouthpiece’.

The indignities, harms, adverse reactions and police state activities involving vaccine issues must be addressed immediately. Therefore, here’s a suggestion to be taken seriously by all who care about what’s happening regarding the “Vaccine Police State” wherever you live.

What to do.

Contact the following law authorities and request a Breach of Fiduciary Responsibility be filed against Big Pharma, vaccine manufacturers and Congress.

The Attorney General of the United States
All Attorneys General[17] of each of the 50 U.S. states
All Inspectors General[18] of every health agency at federal and state levels

While you are at it, kindly remind all officials that the Sherman Antitrust Act[19] and the RICO Act[20] [18 U.S. Code CHAPTER 96—RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS] also are involved.

All The Proof You Need to File Your Requests

Below is a series of “If Truth Be Told” articles published online containing factual science documentation for you to present to authorities, which prove FRAUD regarding vaccine science being a perpetual practice within CDC and FDA.

Are There “Sleeper” VACCINE-caused Mutations Cytochrome P450 Genes Produce Which Medicine Deliberately Ignores (March 4, 2019)
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/03/are-there-sleeper-vaccine-caused-mutations-cytochrome-p450-genes-produce-which-medicine-deliberately-ignores.html

If Truth Be Known About The Mumps Vaccine! Animal Blood Antibodies For 10 Years Got FDA Licensure: FRAUD (March 14, 2019)
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/03/if-truth-be-known-about-the-mumps-vaccine-animal-blood-antibodies-for-10-years-got-fda-licensure-fraud.html

IF Truth Be Told About Vaccines! Risk Of Seizures After MMR & DTP Vaccinations Exist Per CDC Vaccine Safety Datalink Working Group (March 16, 2019)
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/03/if-truth-be-told-about-vaccines-risk-of-seizures-after-mmr-dtp-vaccinations-exist-per-cdc-vaccine-safety-datalink-working-group.html

If Truth Be Told About Fake News, Trolls & “Astroturfing” (March 20, 2019)
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/03/if-truth-be-told-about-fake-news-trolls-astroturfing.html

If Truth Be Told About Cowpox & Smallpox Diseases Scientific Differences That Caused A Pharmaceutical Fairytale (March 25, 2019)
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/03/if-truth-be-told-about-cowpox-smallpox-diseases-scientific-differences-that-caused-a-pharmaceutical-fairytale.html

If Truth Be Told About The SV-40 Cancer Virus In The Original Polio Vaccines Given To Millions Of American Children (March 27, 2019)
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/03/if-truth-be-told-about-the-sv-40-cancer-virus-in-the-original-polio-vaccines-given-to-millions-of-american-children.html

If Truth Be Told About Unreported Vaccine Adverse Reactions: Do VAERS Reports Represent Demographic Statistical Actuality? (March 31, 2019)
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/03/if-truth-be-told-about-unreported-vaccine-adverse-reactions-do-vaers-reports-represent-demographic-statistical-actuality.html

If Truth Be Told: Pregnancy Vaccines Are Not Tested For Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment Of Fertility Proof In Vaccine Package Inserts [April 4, 2019]
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/04/if-truth-be-told-pregnancy-vaccines-are-not-tested-for-carcinogenesis-mutagenesis-impairment-of-fertility-proof-in-vaccine-package-inserts.html

If Truth Be Told About Death, Disability Vaccines Ineffectiveness With Validation From Peer Review Journals, Demographic Charts & Graphs [April6, 2019]
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/04/if-truth-be-told-about-death-disability-vaccines-ineffectiveness-with-validation-from-peer-review-journals-demographic-charts-graphs.html

If Truth Be Told About Measles Deaths In U.S. 2004 to 2015 [April 7, 2019]
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/04/if-truth-be-told-about-measles-deaths-in-u-s-2004-to-2015.html

MMR Vaccine Approved After Only 42-Day-Trials In 1978, Per FDA FOIA Reports [April 13, 2019]
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/04/mmr-vaccine-approved-after-only-42-day-trials-in-1978-per-fda-foia-reports.html

If Truth Be Told About CDC’s Science Manipulators [April 15, 2019]
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/04/if-truth-be-told-about-cdcs-science-manipulators.html

The Pièce de résistance In Vaccine Data

Nothing addresses the documented “numbers game” in vaccine statistics reporting than the two sets of seemingly opposing data below which ought to demonstrate clearly how vaccine data reporting is skewed and cannot be depended upon for accuracy.

Measles U.S. Cases Chart 1950 to 2019
https://www.statista.com/statistics/186678/new-cases-of-measles-in-the-us-since-1950/

1950 319,124
1960 441,783
1970 47,351
1980 13,506
1990 27,786
1991 9,643
1992 2,237
2018 372
2019 555

Now, compare the above figures with the numbers from CDC: is the average numbers game being played?, or so it seems. Who can prove such statistics?

Which data sets represent fraudulent statistics?

CDC’s report most quoted on measles stats
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00056803.htm

Measles.

Measles vaccine was licensed in the United States in 1963. During 1958-1962, an average of 503,282 measles cases and 432 measles-associated deaths were reported each year (9-11). Measles incidence and deaths began to decline in 1965 and continued a 33-year downward trend. This trend was interrupted by epidemics in 1970-1972, 1976-1978, and 1989-1991. In 1998, measles reached a provisional record low number of 89 cases with no measles-associated deaths (13). All cases in 1998 were either documented to be associated with international importations (69 cases) or believed to be associated with international importations (CDC, unpublished data, 1998). In 1994, every dollar spent to purchase measles-containing vaccine saved $10.30 in direct medical costs and $3.20 in indirect societal costs (7)

7. Batelle Medical Technology Assessment and Policy Reserach Program, Centers for Public Health Research and Evaluation. A cost benefit analysis of the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine. Arlington, Virginia: Batelle, 1994
9. CDC. Annual summary 1980: reported morbidity and mortality in the United States. MMWR 1981;29.
10. CDC. Reported incidence of notifiable diseases in the United States, 1960. MMWR 1961;9.
11. CDC. Reported morbidity and mortality in the United States, 1970. MMWR 1971;19.

Lastly, what’s happening in the country of Ukraine where, as of April 3, 2019, there were close to 70,000 cases of measles?

Are children dropping over like flies? How come there seems to be ‘a lid’ on reporting what’s going on regarding a dramatic spread of measles in the European Union? What role do refugees and immigrants from elsewhere play in the spread of infectious diseases[21] anywhere?

Concerned healthcare consumers must recognize what’s become the “tail wagging the dog”: Big Pharma vaccine geopolitics.

Notes:

[1] https://worldaffairs.blog/2015/10/20/how-rockefeller-founded-modern-medicine-and-killed-natural-cures/
[2] Ibid.
[3] https://www.nvic.org/nvic-vaccine-news/november-2016/forced-vaccination-the-tragic-legacy.aspx
[4] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4923397/
[5] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494348/
[6] https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/adjuvants.html
[7] Ibid.
[8] https://www.nvic.org/cmstemplates/nvic/pdf/live-virus-vaccines-and-vaccine-shedding.pdf
[9] https://bergermontague.com/federal-judge-permits-false-claims-act-case-continue-vaccine-manufacturer-merck/
[10] https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/the-fox-owns-the-henhouse-when-public-safety-is-governed-by-private-profit/?utm_source=mailchimp
[11] https://retractionwatch.com/2011/07/11/so-how-often-does-medical-consensus-turn-out-to-be-wrong/
[12] Ibid. study co-author Vinay Prasad
[13] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectic
[14] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364648/?fbclid=IwAR0SKjwd6BTSFxPdnzQFok4ki0ofTE8AZvPuzZj6I311RGfwMwhZa2wm6z4#!po=26.9444https://www.congress.gov/bill/99th-congress/house-bill/5546
[15] https://www.congress.gov/bill/99th-congress/house-bill/5546
[16] Dictionary online
[17] https://legcounsel.house.gov/Comps/Inspector%20General%20Act%20Of%201978.pdf
[18] Ibid.
[19] https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/sherman_antitrust_act
[20] https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-96
[21] https://www.cdc.gov/measles/cases-outbreaks.html

Top image credit: Infowars

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Source

MMR Vaccine Approved After Only 42-Day-Trials In 1978, Per FDA FOIA Reports

By Catherine J. Frompovich

Del Bigtree of High Wire filed FOIA requests with the U.S. FDA for the MMR vaccine trials results. What he got back is more than a shocker; it borders on criminal malfeasance and breach of fiduciary duty, basically. The trials for the MMR vaccine lasted only 42 days! Furthermore, those studies included a total of only 800 kids in 8 studies who, basically, decided the ‘efficacy’ of the MMR vaccine.

Are those 8 measly studies “science-based medicine”?

Here is a link to the study PDF https://icandecide.org/government/FDA-Production-FOIA.pdf .

This is undeniable proof the MMR vaccine studies in 1978 had proven the MMR vaccine has not been proven safe, nor effective in some children who contracted the measles during the trial. There are 215 pages!

ONLY 42-day MMR Vaccine Studies!
Shocking MMR vaccine trial results released — gastrointestinal & upper-respiratory illness reported
9 minutes

[embedded content]
https://youtu.be/Fil_fsdL4ZA?t=35

Print, save and give the PDF link to your pediatrician, family doctor, county health department and school districts. They now should know the real facts regarding the MMR vaccine’s efficacy and safety. The time for vaccine propaganda is up!

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Source

FDA Wants to Lower Amount of Fluoride in Bottled Water, but Scientists Say it is Still Too High

By Emma Fiala

Rather than combating the high levels of pesticides found in much of the food grown in the United States, the negative effects of factory farming, or the lack of clean water available to numerous communities across the country, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is proposing slightly lowering the standard for fluoride content in bottled water.

Thankfully, scientists and environmental organizations alike are pushing back on the proposed changes, saying the new standard will still be too high for safe consumption.

The FDA’s current standard straddles 0.8 and 1.7 milligrams per liter. The new regulation, if finalized, will lower the standard for both imported and domestically packaged bottled water to 0.7 milligrams per liter. The new regulation only addresses bottled water with fluoride added during the process, not bottled water that contains fluoride from the source.

For years, critics of the fluoridation of drinking water have maintained that it is not safe nor helpful in combating tooth decay. As long as critics of fluoride have existed, so has a campaign to mock those same people as conspiracy theorists or science deniers.

In 2015, the U.S. Public Health Service suggested that 0.7 milligrams per liter was the optimal concentration for fluoride in community water. According to the FDA, the proposed rule “is based on findings from evolving research on optimal concentrations of fluoride that balances fluoride’s benefits in preventing tooth decay with its risk of causing dental fluorosis, a condition most often characterized by white patches on teeth.” Dental fluorosis is caused when too much fluoride is consumed while teeth are still developing.

Some scientists are now speaking out, expressing concerns extending beyond tooth health and instances of dental fluorosis.

Christopher Neurath, research director of the American Environmental Health Studies Project, published a study this year highlighting a “dramatic increase in fluorosis” over the last decade. Over 30% of adolescents involved in the study showed “moderate and severe dental fluorosis” with 35% showing lesser, but still significant, signs of dental fluorosis.

Neurath maintains that the slight decrease in bottled water fluoridation that would result if the standard were approved would do little to reduce occurrences of dental fluorosis.

“Dental fluorosis is a visible sign of overexposure to fluoride, but there are other nonvisible signs and adverse health effects that are much more serious,” Neurath said. “Currently, there are rapidly increasing scientific studies showing neurotoxicity to fluoride.”

Dr. Philippe Grandjean, adjunct professor of environmental health at the Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, wrote:

Given that fluoride can damage brain development, I would recommend that the maximum fluoride concentration in bottled water be kept at a lower level than 0.7 mg/L.

Neurath calls the link between IQ and fluoride exposure in the womb their “largest concern.” Neurath insists the effects of prenatal exposure to fluoride on IQ is “very large,” adding that “on a population basis, that’s very concerning.”

As reported by CNN:

Morteza Bashash, an assistant professor in the Dalla Lana School of Public Health at the University of Toronto, found that higher fluoride levels as measured in urine samples of pregnant women are associated with both lower IQ and increased risk of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder among children in Mexico.

Bashash found “a drop in children’s scores on intelligence tests for every 0.5 milligram-per-liter increase in fluoride exposure beyond 0.8 milligrams per liter detected in a pregnant mother’s urine.”

Despite concerns, the American Dental Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics “fully support the public health benefits of community water fluoridation.”

Dr. Grandjean maintains, “Given that fluoride is added to toothpaste to secure that the enamel surface of the teeth is properly protected against caries, there is no need to supplement the dietary fluoride intake.”

For those in the know about the potential effects of water fluoridation, avoiding bottled water in the United States is one way to avoid its ill effects. While many adults and parents choose to avoid toothpaste and dental treatments that include fluoride, many remain unaware or helpless when it comes to municipal water supply fluoridation, meaning the water consumed directly or used in cooking in homes, schools, and restaurants alike contains invisible and odorless fluoride.

More and more Americans are combating municipal water fluoridation by using filtration systems that remove fluoride like reverse osmosis, gravity filters, distillers, and pitchers. While all four types remove fluoride, each has advantages and disadvantages including cost, ease of use, mineralization and more.

In addition to individuals, since 1990 more than 400 communities across the United States and Canada have opted to end municipal fluoridation. A list of those communities can be found here. When it comes to reversing municipal fluoridation, the process usually begins with one concerned citizen making their neighbors and city council aware. Visit the Fluoride Action Network to learn how to start a successful local fluoride-free campaign.

This article was sourced from The Mind Unleashed.

Source

If Truth Be Told: Pregnancy Vaccines Are Not Tested For Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility Proof In Vaccine Package Inserts

By Catherine J. Frompovich

Carcinogenesis: capable of causing cancer(s)
Mutagenesis: capable of causing birth defects
Impairment of Fertility: the ability to interfere with reproduction


What in the world are the dingbats at HHS/CDC/FDA and Big Pharma thinking and implementing in mandating pregnant females receive vaccines which have not been tested for the very horrors pregnant mothers—or anyone else—would want to consider IF they knew the truth about those vaccines?

Below are vaccines pregnant females must receive only relatively recently; the information is taken from vaccine package inserts online. Each vaccine has a Section 13 Nonclinical Toxicology wherein the vaccine manufacturer bold-faced tells the FACT that testing for the vaccine’s capability to cause cancer, birth defects and to interfere with human reproduction HAVE NOT BEEN DONE and, apparently, will never be done, so as to be able to make unknowns a given without legal liability!

Is that science-based medicine?

Is that a fraudulent practice by medicine and pharmacology?

Vaccines Required During Pregnancy

  1. Flu (influenza)

FLUARIX QUADRIVALENT.
GKS 13 NONCLINICAL TOXICOLOGY 13.1

Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility FLUARIX QUADRIVALENT has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or male infertility in animals. Vaccination of female rats with FLUARIX QUADRIVALENT had no effect on fertility [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1)]. — GlaxoSmithKline [Pg. 16]

  1. Tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoidand acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine

GKS Boostrix tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine, adsorbed

13 NONCLINICAL TOXICOLOGY
13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility

BOOSTRIX has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility. GlaxoSmithKline [Pg. 16]

Examples of vaccines to avoid during pregnancy include:

Chickenpox (varicella) vaccine
Measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine
Shingles (varicella-zoster) vaccine

Source: MayoClinic.org

Merck’s MMR II

Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility M-M-R II has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or potential to impair fertility.

Pregnancy Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with M-M-R II. It is also not known whether M-M-R II can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity. Therefore, the vaccine should not be administered to pregnant females; furthermore, pregnancy should be avoided for 3 months following vaccination (see IN (see INDICATIONS AND USAGE, Non-Pregnant Adolescent and Adult Females and CONTRAINDICATIONS). — Merck [Pg.6]

Institute for Vaccine Safety
http://www.vaccinesafety.edu/package_inserts.htm
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
61 vaccine package insert publications
Lists: Vaccine, Antigen(s), Manufacturers, Latest Version [pkg. insert]

Based upon the above information, why aren’t allopathic medical doctors demanding proof of vaccine safety from CDC/FDA and Big Pharma regarding any vaccines ability to cause cancer(s), birth defects and interfere with fertility?

Where is congressional oversight, or is Congress afraid if they investigated, they’d lose their election campaign funding?

If Big Pharma’s largess didn’t fund much of CDC/FDA [The Biopharmaceutical Industry Provides 75% Of The FDA’s Drug Review Budget. Is This A Problem?], and Congress did not receive Big Pharma lobbyists’ election-cycle donations, would U.S. citizens have a better healthcare—or is it sickness care—system

According to Open Secrets, during the 2016 election cycle, the industry gave over$16 million to 399 members of the House of Representatives, an average of more than $40,000 per member. They also gave more than $7 million to a total of 97 senators, at an average of roughly $75,000.

Source: CitizensForEthics.org

If only truth be told!

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Source

If Truth Be Told About The SV-40 Cancer Virus In The Original Polio Vaccines Given To Millions Of American Children

By Catherine J. Frompovich

The current “police state” actions being implemented regarding vaccination dissenters is due to the public’s mistrust of the CDC/FDA/Big Pharma consensus science regarding vaccines unknown viruses and neurotoxic ingredients causing adverse effects in children’s health, which has an historical, plus congressional hearing validation, anyone who values good health and well children must consider seriously.

Merck’s premiere vaccine inventor, Dr. Maurice Hilleman, was astute enough to realize something was amiss with the production of vaccines, which he documents in the video below.

The Polio Vaccine Has Cancer Virus, SV40, According to Dr. Maurice Hilleman
10:37 minutes


https://youtu.be/1-XZs53vZzw?t=6

Widget not in any sidebars

When he spoke about bringing the monkeys over from Africa, which they used to manufacture the polio vaccine, he had this to say, “I brought African greens in. I didn’t know we were importing AIDS virus at the time.”[1]

Dr. Hilleman stated, “Yellow fever vaccine had leukemia virus in it. This was in the day of very crude science. [1]

If you think the above was something “of a fluke” or a “figment of conspiracy theorists imaginations,” then you absolutely ought to read the U.S. Government Printing Office online published report of the September 10, 2003 Hearing of the Subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness of the Committee on Government Reform of the House of Representatives of the 108th Congress wherein Congressman Dan Burton is on public record saying:

There is no dispute that millions of Americans received polio vaccines that were contaminated with the virus called Simian Virus 40, or SV-40. There also is no dispute that SV-40 is capable of causing cancer, but there is a major dispute as to how many Americans may have received the contaminated vaccine, with estimates ranging from 4 million to 100 million people. There is also a major dispute as to when the polio vaccine supply got cleaned up. In addition, nobody knows how many people got sick or died because of the contaminated vaccines.

However, Dr. James Goedert, Chief of Viral Epidemiology, National Cancer Institute, provided an answer as to when the polio vaccine got cleaned up:

In addition, using PCR technology, the FDA itself found no SV-40 DNA molecules in lots that were released between 1972 and 1996.

When did you or your children receive the polio vaccine?

Can the SV-40 cancer virus be lurking within your body?

Why do I say that?

Because the Journal of Infectious Diseases published the article “Simian Virus 40 and Human Disease” wherein this was discussed:

The reported presence of SV40 in tumors in individuals born after 1963 would seem to imply that SV40 is now established as a human infection circulating in communities via person-to-person contact [8]. Other investigators have been skeptical of these claims [9–12]; several groups have not been able to detect SV40 sequences in the aforementioned tumors [13–20], and epidemiologic studies have not revealed an increased risk of these cancers in populations exposed to SV40-contaminated poliovaccines or adenovirus vaccines.

[8] Vilchez RA, Butel JS, Emergent human pathogen simian virus 40 and its role in cancer, Clin Microbiol Rev, 2004, vol. 17 (pg. 495-508)

[CJF emphasis]

In view of the cancer epidemic of recent years, one has to wonder what role, if any, the SV-40 cancer virus in the early polio vaccine had, or is implicated in current cancer demographics, especially in older individuals who received the polio vaccine as a child.

I’d like to point out that FDA used the Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis, a test FDA will not permit to be used to test for determining adverse mitochondrial proclivities (reactions) from mandatory vaccines prior to receiving vaccines/vaccinations, especially in infants whose immune systems are not developed fully until around two years of age!

In those individuals with mitochondrial proclivities, vaccination can be equivalent to immune system castration!

The FDA PCR directive, alone, ought to be considered as criminal activity, since such FDA actions deliberately – by the omission of PCR testing as a routine prophylactic procedure – contributes directly to any vaccine adverse reactions infants, toddlers, teens and adults would experience. Therefore, FDA ought to be held accountable, plus prosecuted, for malfeasance in the management of infectious disease protocols, in my opinion!

References:

[1] unhoodwinked Published on Jan. 9, 2015

Source

If Truth Be Known About The Mumps Vaccine! Animal Blood Antibodies For 10 Years Got FDA Licensure: FRAUD

By Catherine J. Frompovich

In Southeastern Pennsylvania, where I live, a recent ‘pandemic (?)’ of sorts seems to have broken out regarding the infectious disease known as MUMPS. Twenty-some cases!, and everyone is just about going bonkers, specifically one of the universities where the outbreak has been more prominent.

Parents, according to radio news reports, are very upset about the Mumps outbreak. What would those parents have done when Mumps was prevalent when I was a kid in the 1940s? Surprisingly, everyone got well; no deaths, either; Mumps was a child’s “rite of passage,” which “tuned” up the child’s immune system. And, more frightening than anything for current fear-mongered parents to ponder, there was no MMR vaccine doctors could recommend then, since that vaccine did not come on the market until 1971, as Wikipedia points out:

The MMR vaccine was developed by Maurice Hilleman. It was licensed for use by Merck in 1971. Stand alone measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines had been previously licensed in 1963, 1967, and 1969 respectively.

However, what most parents, the university involved, and the Philadelphia media talking heads obviously don’t know, nor want to factor into the equation of vaccine safety and efficacy – especially regarding Merck’s MMR vaccine – is that for close to ten (10) years Merck falsified the Mumps active in the MMR vaccine as having a 95 per cent efficacy rate, which was a bold face fraudulent, scientific lie reported to CDC and FDA, and in turn to the entire globe, since CDC/FDA ‘vaccine theology’ is regarded as an apparent ‘gold standard’?

Those college students who presently have contracted Mumps apparently received the MMR vaccine of the 1990s false efficacy rating for the Mumps active. What impact did that have upon those children’s immune systems?

How incredible those parents deliberately were deceived into believing their children were vaccinated against the Mumps!

But that’s not the only deception(s) regarding vaccines and their politics in medicine and population control methods, which the CDC and FDA are responsible for promoting! Many whistleblowers have come forward over the years about deceit, deception, fraud, consensus science collusion [RICO crimes?] (see the movie VAXXED) and a qui tam whistleblower lawsuit filed in Philadelphia Federal Court, which is discussed below, so gung-ho vaccine acolytes, uneducated MDs and parents can understand how they really are being duped when it comes to vaccines and immunity, especially “community immunity,” aka “herd immunity.”

Huff Post: Merck Has Some Explaining To Do Over Its MMR Vaccine Claims

According to Huff Post,

The first court case, United States v. Merck & Co., stems from claims by two former Merck scientists that Merck “fraudulently misled the government and omitted, concealed, and adulterated material information regarding the efficacy of its mumps vaccine in violation of the FCA [False Claims Act].

[….]

According to the whistleblowers’ court documents, Merck’s misconduct was far-ranging: It “failed to disclose that its mumps vaccine was not as effective as Merck represented, (ii) used improper testing techniques, (iii) manipulated testing methodology, (iv) abandoned undesirable test results, (v) falsified test data, (vi) failed to adequately investigate and report the diminished efficacy of its mumps vaccine, (vii) falsely verified that each manufacturing lot of mumps vaccine would be as effective as identified in the labeling, (viii) falsely certified the accuracy of applications filed with the FDA, (ix) falsely certified compliance with the terms of the CDC purchase contract, (x) engaged in the fraud and concealment describe herein for the purpose of illegally monopolizing the U.S. market for mumps vaccine, (xi) mislabeled, misbranded, and falsely certified its mumps vaccine, and (xii) engaged in the other acts described herein to conceal the diminished efficacy of the vaccine the government was purchasing.

These fraudulent activities, say the whistleblowers, were designed to produce test results that would meet the FDA’s requirement that the mumps vaccine was 95 per cent effective. To the whistleblowers’ delight, the judge dismissed Merck’s objections to the case proceeding, finding the whistleblowers had plausible grounds on all of the claims lodged against Merck.

So, how did Merck allegedly produce 95 per cent effectiveness in the mumps portion of the MMR vaccine results – for almost ten years during the 1990s?

According to two Merck employee mumps vaccine whistleblowers qui tam lawsuit filed in Philadelphia, PA Federal Court, UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Stephen A. KRAHLING and Joan A. Wlochowski, Relators,v. MERCK & CO., INC., Defendant, :

Merck added animal [rabbit] blood antibodies to raise the mumps active in the MMR vaccine to the FDA’s required 95 per cent effective rate, in order to keep Merck’s apparent ‘monopoly’ on the MMR vaccine sales globally.

The Wall Street Journal article asked, “Did Merck Unfairly Monopolize the Market for a Mumps Vaccine?”

Here’s what CaseText.com has to say about that case, which the Judge would not dismiss:

Relators claim that the use of animal antibodies created a high number of pre-vaccinated results, which Defendant systematically destroyed or falsified in order to legitimize the use of animal antibodies.

Ref: Background “B”

Invex News.com: The “FREE” Press Is NOT Free To Tell The Facts About Vaccines

Activist Post: It’s Finally Time For Everyone To Get Real About Measles

The problems with vaccines only grow more complicated the longer the U.S. Congress does not provide an investigation into the fraud in vaccines, which Rep. Bill Posey had requested in 2015; it’s now 2019?

If you’ve never heard Rep. Posey’s opening remarks in the video below, you need to, as they provide a factual reality check with regard to the irresponsible fraudulent vaccine science that has overtaken federal government agencies; counterfeited medical science; and still no one in Congress is concerned about doing anything to correct the destructive “tail wagging the dog.”

Rep Begs Congress: Investigate Vaccine Autism Coverup – C-SPAN 29-07-2015

5:07 minutes

[embedded content]

Resource:

Feature Film by producers of VAXXED
Injecting Aluminum Trailer 2:35 minutes (2017)
http://cinemalibrestudio.com/injecting-aluminum/watch.html?ct=t()

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Source

FDA Approves Controversial GMO Salmon For Import

The United States Food and Drug Administration has decided that their previous ban on genetically modified salmon can be lifted.  In 2016, Congress said the salmon could not be sold in the United States until the FDA finalized labeling guidelines to inform consumers the product was genetically engineered. That’s when the FDA implemented the import alert.

But all that has changed now. In 2015, the FDA deemed the AquaAdvantage Salmon safe, marking the first U.S. approval of a genetically engineered animal intended for food.  But the 2016 import alert prevented the salmon from being sold in the U.S…until now.

According to CNN,  Congress passed a law directing the U.S. Department of Agriculture to set a national mandatory standard for disclosing bioengineered foods. That standard was issued last December.

FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb said because of the 2016 law and the USDA’s new standard, the FDA “no longer has the authority to issue labeling guidance,” CNN reported. “However, the FDA believes this Congressional mandate has been satisfied by the USDA’s issuance of final regulations implementing that law in late 2018 because the law and regulations require that human food containing GE [genetically engineered] salmon bear labeling indicating that it is bioengineered,” Gottlieb said in a statement.

This will allow for the importation of genetically modified salmon eggs into the U.S. to be raised for human consumption.

For some, GMO, when used for food, is a blessing.  The ability to feed many more people than possible with strictly organically raised animals. Many feel that in order to sustain the constantly burgeoning population, GMO foods are a necessity. But for others, the health risks and long term unknown consequences are a curse.

Many claim GMO foods are safe; however, most of the research used to claim that GMOs are safe has been performed by biotechnology companies – those who stand to profit from proclaiming GMOs as “safe.” Still, “several animal studies indicate serious health risks associated with genetically modified (GM) food (AAEM 2009),” including infertility, immune problems, accelerated aging, faulty insulin regulation, and changes in major organs and the gastrointestinal system.

Will you be trying some GMO salmon?

Click here to subscribe: Join over one million monthly readers and receive breaking news, strategies, ideas and commentary. You can read more from Mac Slavo at his site SHTFplan.com

Source